|
uggs for sale or
Wednesday, February 6, 2013, 7:07 AM
[General]
Avoiding The Blister Blues - Article: 401032 at Isnare.com Free Articles
One reason for the growing number of complaints is clearly the result of the yards and independent contractors have stepped up their efforts in marketing solutions for blister repair. Blister repair has become a big business and repairers roaming around the yard in search of blistered boats, looking for the repair work. This may mean that if the inspector finds no blisters on a helmet, probably these people.
One problem with a solution
Despite numerous studies, research reports and journal articles on the subject, there is not much agreement on the cause and effect of blisters. Most of the literature seems to repair the solutions instead of avoiding the occurrence of blisters in the first place.
The simple fact is that the hull blistering is caused by the use of poor quality and inferior layup. As Lee Dana, former head of engineering at Bertram Yates told the audience at the annual conference of the National Association of Marine Surveyors in 1985, helmets constructed of high quality resins with no blister. If builders want to build hulls that do not blister, all you have to do is spend another ten dollars per gallon of resin, “said
This fact is well known, but rarely examined by the inspectors or the boating public. Boat builders, if you want to build hulls with lower resin, then, not experts, should be paying the price with the complaints and warranty claims. Unfortunately, most of the grievances and complaints against inspectors occur with larger vessels that are out of warranty or the manufacturer is no longer in business. Moreover, most of the guarantees only the first order to the owner of the vessel, leaving the next buyer in the lurch, which explains why the inspector finishes in a vulnerable position.
The good news is there are a number of things that the inspectors can do to protect themselves. And, if not already doing them, this article offers some very effective methods to protect against the problems that rightfully belong to the boat builder.
The genesis of problems
My examination of about a dozen complaints against inspectors shows that almost all of them had problems because (1) could not locate the ampulla, or (2) not giving proper advice to the client. Most argue that the inspector did not inform the client or the presence of blisters at all, or that their existence is only mentioned, but downplayed its significance.
In at least three cases, the client keeps the blisters that have substantially worse shortly after the survey was conducted cheap uggs, a claim which is dubious at best. In one case a customer claimed that blisters appeared on an older vessel a year after a survey revealed that there are no blisters uggs in the sale, the “mystery syndrome blister.” Otherwise, it was alleged that the ampulla appeared only a few months later.
Frankly, it is difficult to put much stock in the mystery blister syndrome. Despite its well known that blisters significantly change its profile as a result of changes in environmental conditions such as temperature, humidity and dry after being towed by a period of time, but I see a case of deflated blisters that do not are easily observable under appropriate conditions. Nor have I heard of any documented cases where blisters developed rapidly (The lone exception was Hatteras yacht was known at the same time you used a grossly inferior because gelcoat painted their helmets). The minimum development time of new vessels appeared to be about three years, but usually much longer.
Three blisters that appear in this photo of a boat bottom that is very clean and smooth. Two of them are easily revealed by the fluids that leaked out after the boat was sitting for many weeks. However, the blister on the middle child is just visible. All of these were highlighted by a blistering good artificial light used to take the picture. Without illumination, and the absence of tears, which would have been very difficult to locate these blisters. After wetting with water, were much easier to see. If the bottom were dirty, it is unlikely to have been located.
|
|